This entry was posted on Mar 15, 2012 at 6:12 pm and is filed under Institutions, Seen elsewhere. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
2 Responses to On the attacks on Mark Littlewood
Paul Marks on Mar 15, 2012 at 10:42 pm
It is almost as if the newspaper producing this smear job was owned by a KGB disinformation man.
However, the newspaper is “Independent” (it is the very title of the publication), so that could not possibly be true.
As the saying goes; when your getting flack, it means you’re over the target.
These puritan bastards cannot stand anyone who can rationally dispute their wafer-thin ‘evidence’. Their strategy, the same as the enviro-mentalists is to accuse everyone who disagrees of being in the pay of ‘Big Tobacco’ / ‘Big Oil’ (delete as applicable).
What probably also pisses them off is that Mark is a liberal, and this adds to the exposure of themselves as jackboot-licking control-freaks.
It is almost as if the newspaper producing this smear job was owned by a KGB disinformation man.
However, the newspaper is “Independent” (it is the very title of the publication), so that could not possibly be true.
As the saying goes; when your getting flack, it means you’re over the target.
These puritan bastards cannot stand anyone who can rationally dispute their wafer-thin ‘evidence’. Their strategy, the same as the enviro-mentalists is to accuse everyone who disagrees of being in the pay of ‘Big Tobacco’ / ‘Big Oil’ (delete as applicable).
What probably also pisses them off is that Mark is a liberal, and this adds to the exposure of themselves as jackboot-licking control-freaks.