Quote of the evening

I poked further and found assorted interviews of the kind of jaw-dropping rightwingness that used to get pop singers castigated in the music press, but seem to have passed under the radar entirely – despite Turner’s status as an arena-headlining act. I started tweeting some of the choicer quotes, and soon Twitter seemed to be abuzz with amazement at what he’s had to say. – Michael Hann, Guardian

So hang on, is leftwinginess some kind of qualification?

Seriously, they just don’t notice how bloody closed minded they are do they?

5 responses to “Quote of the evening”

  1. I think that “Rush” were Randian Objectivists – I do not know how their politics got treated by the American or British music press (or the press generally).

    However, generally any expression of “conservative” political opinions is death for pop music group.

    Although it is O.K. for Country music people – at least in the United States Country music people in the United States can be on the “right” or the “left” (yes being on the left is fine) – but Pop music people have to be on the left (or risk being destroyed professionally).

    Like

  2. It’s amusing that to make an inordinate amount of money from the music biz you must support a world view that contradicts your very existence.

    Like

    1. This is somewhere where objectivist ethics, aesthetics and commentary (if I’ve understood it correctly) contains an answer, but purely political libertarianism does not.

      If you are programmed from birth to respond to need, rather than value, then to find a song compelling it will generally contain suffering. In order to portray suffering one must suffer themselves. Artists who do well tend to be ones that suffered at some time. Living a contradiction from the moment your parents begin to speak tends to produce a fucked up life, which means you suffer and can be a good artist. Ergo, it is in fact a qualification which helps to produce a tone in the music that is appreciated.

      The reason I enjoy Frank’s music is that although he talks about feeling fear and having a fucked up drunken drug addled past, he does so from the position of a survivor, so he weaves in something of value for the perceptive listener. And also, I don;t have to put up with the dumbheaded politics of e.g. Nizlopi.

      However, I don’t think the Gaurdian article was making an aesthetic observation about Frank’s music, it was just being prejudiced.

      Like

      1. That is quite a reply Simon – quite a lot to think about.

        Like

  3. […] this a part of the book where she was least persuasive. But there is something wrong, she was onto something, and this made-up word “misiberabilism” gets closer to it than several thousand of […]

    Like

Leave a reply to “Miserabilism” | Libertarian Home Cancel reply