If anyone should yield it’s the “Democrats”

Richard Carey leaves a comment reminding us of a few truths about the US constitution:

it’s like the Queen (Obama) and the House of Lords (Senate) blocking the Commons (House of Representatives). If anyone should yield, it’s Obama and the Senate.

The analogy seems to hold. Our Lords are not democratically elected at all, but the Senate is not perfectly democratic either. The numbers of Senators fall in line with the average world view of the States, not with the populations of those states. Originally, if I recall correctly, they were not even elected. Their role was intended as a safe guard against the excesses of the mob.

Meanwhile the House is more democratic and it is responsible for the budget. This is to protect the people against the excesses of an elite, in particular against excess tax, a big issue during our civil war where tax was wanted by the King to suppress insurrection in Ireland.

US Capitol SenateIn this case, the elite wants bureaucratic control over healthcare. They think it will be cheaper that way, but prices, as Brother Ivo tells us, are rising and there is a question about unfunded liabilities. The House is therefore stepping in and seeking to protect the masses from those liabilities and all sorts of other drags on employment that ObamaCare will create. All that is happening seems to fit neatly with these responsibilities. The elite have got something wrong, it could get expensive and the more democratic house charged with worrying about the money is, rightly, worrying about the money.

The least accountable person, Barack Obama, is the one wanting to spend all the money, and as we know you have to be accountable when it comes to money.

Unless you knew all that then the Republican position could seem like madness, but it is actually all rather logical. It is also very consistent with our system. The Commons initiates a budget, the Lords is our scrutinising house, the Queens role is to protect against excesses and the form, indeed the law, is that the Commons has superiority over both of the more elite and less democratic institutions. The “Democrats” should remember that they hold the two least democratic positions.

Thanks to Brother Ivo and Richard for surfacing these details. Brother Ivo in particular has a lot more to offer. Go read.

3 Comments

  1. Under the Constitution of the United States of America all money bills must start in the House of Representatives (by the way the “Affordable Care Act” of 2010 started in the Senate) and government may not raise or spend money without the consent of the House of Representatives.

    “But the House did consent – back in 2010” – that is an Ancient Regime FRENCH view of the matter “the King may levy this tax and spend this money because the Estates General consented – back in 1640” (or whenever). The English view always was that taxes could not be levied and spent without the PRESENT consent of the PRESENT House (not some past House years ago). If a King did not wish to call a Parliament fine – but then the King COULD NOT TAX.

    Barack Obama and his supporters have rejected the traditional Constitutional view of these matters – he is acting like Louis XIV (the “Sun King”).

    Like

    Reply

  2. “The numbers of Senators fall in line with the average world view of the States, not with the populations of those states. Originally, if I recall correctly, they were not even elected. ”

    They were originally appointed by the legislatures of the States. Changing this, via the 17th Amendment, to a position directly elected fundamentally changed the role of the Senate and the relationship of the States to the national government in Washington.

    Like

    Reply

  3. Thinking of the American system in terms of an 18th century king is actually helpful to me as an Englishman (who would otherwise think our system where the government sits in the legislature is *normal*) to understand the relationship between the different parts. The American system is not supposed to be like an 18th century monarch, but that’s how it has developed, due to more power amassing in the hands of the President, and the balancing power of the States being undermined.

    Like

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s